The practicality of seat ventilation has garnered much attention, but from another perspective, there are reasons that may make people less inclined to choose seat ventilation function.
Firstly, compared to seat heating, seat ventilation is not as widespread. Especially for friends in northern regions, seat ventilation may not be deemed necessary for installation. When purchasing a car, considering the cost of seat ventilation can be relatively high, which is one of the reasons why it cannot be widely popularized.
Secondly, there may be some drawbacks to using seat ventilation for extended periods. Although there are generally no obvious issues, prolonged use of seat ventilation may lead to back pain and discomfort.
This could be a problem for those who need to drive for long periods as they may feel uncomfortable. Therefore, when considering seat ventilation, it's necessary to weigh its pros and cons.
Additionally, the retrofitting cost of seat ventilation is also an important consideration.
However, regardless of the chosen method, seat removal and circuit rearrangement are necessary tasks, which also increase the complexity and cost of retrofitting.
Lastly, the effectiveness of seat ventilation also varies. Blowing-type seat ventilation has a stronger airflow and feels cooler when turned on, but it may not be suitable for long-term use.
In contrast, suction-type ventilation is relatively gentler, and even with extended use, it is less likely to cause back pain. Therefore, when choosing seat ventilation, it's important to balance the differences between the two based on personal needs and preferences.
